Richard Louv's latest
book was featured in a fascinating
interview last night on
WBUR's show
On Point. I tried calling in a comment, but called too late to get on the air -- so you guys win the prize instead.
The gist of the book is that children are being warned not to play in the great outdoors that much and are being encouraged instead to play at home -- with the result being that they spend way too much time on the Playstation and the Nintendo, and not enough time in the woods. A second result is that our kids are becoming strangers to Nature and suffering from what he calls "nature deficit disorder."
Good heavens, not another mental health disease. But the author, along with Jack Beatty and guest commentator David Sobel, made some interesting points that suggest we are alienating kids from nature at our own risk.
It's interesting that our kids are becoming more cut off from nature even as young adults are getting more into extreme and dangerous activities in the outdoors. (Witness last decade's trend in bungee-jumping, and spinnaker-flying and hang-gliding today, as well as the spate a few years ago of best-selling books about hiking and mountain-climbing disasters.)
My sense is that these two phenomena are related. Kids who grow up with nature-deficit disorder today might risk becoming tomorrow's bungee-jumpers. If the world is too contained and safe today, tomorrow they may be putting themselves into dangerous situations without knowing the risks. If you grow up not knowing the outdoors, then you also don't understand the reality. Nature is often beautiful, often peaceful, but it is
always bigger than you, and it can kill if you don't respect its power.
As a child I grew up near water. My parents taught me a healthy respect for the harbor. They never discouraged me from swimming or boating, but they lectured me early on that it takes very little water to drown a person. They made sure I understood what I was doing before taking on any new activity on the water, and they always made me wear a personal flotation device (what we used to call a "life-preserver") whenever on a boat. While I doubt that the little suburban water community where I grew up would qualify in Louv's reckoning as "nature", it seems to me that my parents' cautious approach is being thrown out.
A further point, which Louv made, is that, somewhere among this generation of children is next generation's conservation leaders. In other words, the future president of the
Sierra Club (to say nothing of the future head of the U.S. Forest Service) is out there somewhere as a child, and it would be pretty important for that person to have a close relationship with nature --
now.